The Seventh Sunday of Easter

16th May 2010:   Sung Eucharist (9.00 am)

Preacher: The Revd John Chynchen, Cathedral Chaplain

Readings: Ezekiel 36. 24 – 28; Acts 16. 16 – 34; John 17. 20 – 26

 

W S Gilbert was the librettist — the wordsmith — who conjoined with the composer Arthur Sullivan was responsible for those late Victorian operettas that attracted full houses in Hong Kong 30 odd years ago when performed by  Sceneshifters or  the Hong Kong Singers, starring household names such as Gordon Jones and Richard Mills-Owen.

I offer you this witty dash of Gilbert’s verse from Act 2 of Iolanthe:

 

I often think it’s comical

How Nature always does contrive

That every boy and gal,

That’s born into the world alive,

Is either a little Liberal,

Or else a little Conservative!

 

In the middle of this last week, what has been called “Britain’s accidental revolution” — a liberal conservative coalition cobbled together in the aftermath of an inconclusive general election which left the UK with a ‘hung parliament’ — has been hailed by most of the pundits and 60% of the population as strong, stable and consensual…the new grown-up politics of compromise.

 

It all reminds me of that other established institution, the Church of England…when I was in training for the ministry at Salisbury twenty years ago. It was still functioning as a broad, working coalition of Liberal and Conservative churchmanship (not forgetting an elaborate and colourful Anglo-Catholic minority) in which people, in general, behaved civilly in a grown-up way. Sadly, with 10% of the 21st century well-nigh behind us, the worldwide churches of the Anglican Communion are sliding ever deeper into a chasm of old-style adversarial conflict which leaves the old political variety seeming more like a tea party!  

 

In Los Angeles, just a few hours ago, Mary Glasspool, who has been with her partner Becki for 22 years, became the first openly gay bishop in the United States since Gene Robinson was consecrated seven years ago. ‘Seat belts will be fastened’ in the Episcopal Church as they brace themselves for a wave of vilification and demagoguery, particularly from Anglicans in Africa and the rest of the so-called Global South.

 

In the space of a week we will have witnessed the world’s oldest parliamentary democracy strive for and achieve improbable unity of purpose in its government while its established church — and the  worldwide churches it spawned in the fit of empire — move in the opposite direction towards disunity, fraction and schism. But one must remember that the politicians are not relying upon a few short verses from the Bible as their roadmap.

 

As Providence would have it, in this morning’s reading from John’s gospel, Jesus is talking about unity. It is there in the text all right, but the message comes to us in the form of long and convoluted sentences. They fall delightfully on the ear, but defy our ability to keep who is who in order as we listen. It is a paradox, really, because what is the sense of cloaking the concept of unity in all these words?

 

Perhaps that's part of the message. Unity is like that. All our attempts to be similar are like that. When we try to be "one" we soon run into situations we may not like. If being "one" means conforming to a set of rules, some soon become uncomfortable. When the rules are broken or when they change, others feel excluded. 

 

A former student at a Roman Catholic convent school tells a story about a day at the school when a Papal Nuncio came to visit. It was Friday. All of the students were deeply impressed by this imposing but nice Italian prelate in his purple cassock and biretta, and even more so when he dispensed them from the “no meat on Fridays” rule. 

 

Of course, all of the students wanted to have meat for lunch that day, but they were too nervous to do it.  Did anyone, even the distinguished visitor, have the authority to decide that eating meat on Friday was okay? What if their immortal souls would be placed in terrible danger by having meat for lunch?  The students discussed this anxiously long after lunchtime was over and the car bearing the visitor had disappeared. For one boy the tension was simply too much. He threw up! Those students with a legalistic turn of mind debated long into the afternoon as to whether, technically, he had actually eaten meat, or not.

 

The strict Friday abstinence is a thing of the past, but dogma remains in other guises. It satisfies the cravings of people who need rules to follow, explanations to quote, and implacable authorities to respect. Fine for them, but there is an opposite end to the scale and there are many points in-between. 

 

You may say there is more merit in being one who needs rules to follow, and faithfully follows them, than being one who despises rules and ignores them. For the sake of order that is probably true, but there used to be very few Anglicans to be found at either extreme end of the scale. Our delight was being in between. Not necessarily in accord, of course, and probably tending towards one direction or the other, but nevertheless avoiding the end zones.  Can a people who count among their good traits the phrase "comfortable with ambiguity" also claim to be "one?" Jesus prays today that we be "one," but does this mean "the same?”  Unity does not mean sameness. It means similarity of purpose, of intention, of allegiance and of behavior towards one another. It means accepting. For those who believe, it means gathering under the canopy of creation and being part of a great singleness of purpose.

 

"You loved me from before the creation of the world" Jesus says. The God of the early inhabitants of the earth was known through nature and the surprises of the climate and weather. This was also the God of Attila the Hun, of the Borgia popes, of the despot queen or king, and all who compromise the broad understandings of what is right and good. The same God of the desert fathers, ascetics, philanthropists, saints and scholars, and the tireless caregivers for the poorest of the poor, indeed all who pursue the broad understandings of what is right and good.

 

Does this mean that God is not immutable, that God keeps pace with us, is evolving as we do and will keep up with us even as we move from fantasy into the reality of exploring in space? It is an arrogance to think that God is keeping pace with us because who knows if "us" is all there is?

 

If God is immutable, however, can nothing ever change? We know that to be patently untrue. Theologians have a lot to say on these subjects and I suppose the most straightforward answer is that God and creation are always "one" no matter what part of creation we are looking at, or the era we are considering.    

 

The elegance of the wording of our passage from John leads us to an appreciation of the elegance of God's purpose for us. Creation is an evolving, changing, and developing phenomenon that attests to the dazzling finesse of our God and the exquisite perfection of the relationship that we share with God in Jesus Christ.

 

That this relationship could exclude anyone is beyond imagining. To those who might wonder if the majority always represents what must be right, to the exclusion of others, Jesus points out that the world, with its myriad expressions of diversity, is the object of God's love, and that all those who comprise the world — in the there and then, as well as in the here and now, share equally in the opportunity to bathe in the radiance of that unity for which he prays.

 

These are thoughts to hold close in times of division, when deep misunderstandings keep faithful people of differing persuasions at arm's length, when honest beliefs stray from reality and when home-spun science collides with authentic research. It is easy to find ways to despise what we do not understand, to hate what does not resonate with our own experience, to fear what seems alien. We support these convictions with anecdotal evidence and with snippets of scripture. It is harder to seek ways to understand, to broaden our experience and to look with fresh eyes at those who differ from the majority in any number of possible ways. It is hard to accept that each and every one of us is a minority of one kind or another.

 

Yet the eyes that are sometimes fresh to us are the experienced eyes of Jesus Christ, who calls us to unity greater than the sum of our selves. It is a unity made both possible and perfect by the extravagant and abundant love of God. Amen.